Kategorie 'Vorschriften & Normen'

Nachhaltigkeit bei KUKA

Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2016 - 20:22

Beim Thema “Nachhaltigkeit” wird ein chinesischer Investor bei KUKA vermutlich nichts verändern. In https://www.kuka.com/en-de/about-kuka/strategy/sustainability beschreibt Kuka gut die verschiedenen für KUKA relevanten Standards. Zum Thema “psychische Belastungen” finde ich bei KUKA keine Aussagen.

Es gibt eine Beschwerde aus dem Jahr 2010, dass der Betriebsrat “massiv bekämpft” werde, aber ein Gesamtbild über die Zustände bei KUKA ergibt das nicht.

Arbeitsschutznorm ISO 45001 nicht vor 2017

Dienstag, 14. Juni 2016 - 06:55

Der umstrittenste Standard in der Geschichte der ISO:

SCCM: Publications in English

Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2016 - 20:08

http://english.sccm.nl/content/publicationsdownloads

Besonders interessant:

O-11 7 February 2013
Certification scheme for occupational health and safety (OHS) management systems according to OHSAS 18001

Bye bye to ISO 45001:2016
Hello to ISO 45001:2017

Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2016 - 09:34

https://www.google.de/search?q=%22ISO+45001%22+draft++delay&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A5%2F1%2F2016%2Ccd_max%3A

Elsmarcove

Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2016 - 00:35

Elsmarcove is back. I still don’t understand, what is going on there in the US in the standardization and auditing business - which already looks strange enough to me in Europe. Whatsoever, I’ll watch their ISO 45001 forum.

From OHSAS 18001 to ISO 45001

Samstag, 30. April 2016 - 17:59

What will the World do with OHSAS 18001 when ISO 45001 is published? (https://www.linkedin.com/groups/8319963/8319963-6130997825703542787, Chris J Ward CMIOSH, Committee member at British Standards Institution ISO 45001)

[...] It cannot just be withdrawn immediately. It is written into law or regulation in some countries and this will take time to manage. There is a three year migration period planned to allow organizations to move from OHSAS 18001 to ISO 45001 and this migration should not be too difficult for those already implementing OHSAS 18001.
[...]
Read the Draft Standard and more on my website http://www.iso45001assessment.com/
And more on my Linkedin group EHS ISO 45001 https://www.linkedin.com/groups/8319963

In my country (Germany) the change will be very interesting to works councils. Here most employees didn’t have a clue when OHSAS 18001 was implemented in their companies, even though leaving them clueless was not only not compliant with the standard, it also was against the OH&S laws. But now, if the employee representatives learned from that and if they got involved in audititing their employers’ OH&S management system based on OHSAS 18001, they will be better prepared to use the migration form OHSAS 18001 to ISO 45001 as an occasion to apply their rights&duties (co-determination) when implementing ISO 45001.

Oxebridge

Samstag, 2. April 2016 - 22:24

This is about the business of certifying companies based on ISO9001-like standards. That business always seemed to be strange to me. Now I know, that it is strange. It is tailored to the needs of the players in the certification business and not to the needs of the end users. I experienced myself that even the German accreditation authority tolerates sloppy audits. People who want to change that have to cope with quite some trouble.
 
http://us3.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d60008840b25d7a6ddf9cebf3&id=6660b1ed2e&e=b808c1a4d2

Regarding the Proliferation of Online Defamation

In recent months, there has been a troubling, nearly “viral” spread of misinformation and defamatory claims made against Oxebridge and its staff. This includes a series of… well, insane posts on Ripoff Report, a site which then requests thousands of dollars to have them redacted. All the defamatory material is being published by ISO certification industry players who are frustrated with Oxebridge’s reform efforts. There is no surprise as to why this is happening.

Oxebridge is currently under a US Federal court order not to discuss issues pertaining to ongoing litigation in this area. Unfortunately, the publishers of such material are currently not restricted in this manner, and thus their misinformation is spreading while we cannot publicly rebut it. We are working with the Court on a means of allowing us to address the false claims while respecting other parties in the litigation and not, accidentally, defaming anyone else in the process. The court has a balance to strike, and we are hopeful we can help them find the right balance.

If you are reading anything about any litigation regarding Oxebridge, it is likely utterly false, since the parties themselves are currently prohibited from speaking about it. This includes any alleged posts of “court documents” published online by anonymous trolls.

For now, we ask that Oxebridge clients, supporters, readers and the public consider facts over any unfounded and anonymous rumors they may find on the internet:

  • Oxebridge is working to reform the certification scheme so that auditors may not simultaneously consult, thereby avoiding an Enron-style scandal within the quality assurance field. This upsets CBs and their auditors, who want to conduct both services with impunity, thus doubling their revenue streams.
  • Oxebridge is working to put the unaccredited “certificate mills” out of business entirely, so they will be forced to stop issuing “certs by mail” to any organization willing to pay a few hundred dollars. Obviously, the mill operators are upset with this.
  • Oxebridge is releasing free documentation kits to help companies adopt the new ISO 9001:2015 standard, which Oxebridge feels was updated unnecessarily. Both ISO and competing consultants are upset with this, as it cuts into their cynical profiteering.
  • Oxebridge is fighting the standards development bodies to ensure greater representation of ISO 9001 user organizations, and to limit the ability of private consultants from using their roles in such committees to enrich their private consulting practices. ISO, ANSI, and ASQ are upset with this, as it foils their publishing deals and high-priced seminars.
  • Oxebridge is positioning itself to testify before the US Congress on the scandals within the ISO certification scheme, and how they link to deadly disasters such as DeepWater Horizon and Takata airbag deaths. ISO and ANSI are upset with this, as it means they will be formally investigated.

While all of these efforts hope to benefit you, the user of ISO standards, obviously this puts us in the cross-hairs of the industry incumbents. For now, due to the court order, we cannot publicly rebut the critics and trolls. That is changing, however. Oxebridge is pursuing subpoenas to identify anonymous posters of defamatory information and engaging law enforcement when the activities violate the law. We are working with the court to be able to clearly and unequivocally debunk the false claims being made.

In the meantime, if you want to show your support of Oxebridge, consider a donation to the ISO 9001 Users Legal Defense Fund. The funds will go towards helping Oxebridge pursue legal challenges to the incumbents, and break their stranglehold over the end users of ISO 9001. Also, when you see negative online commentary about Oxebridge, be sure to let the posters know you’re not happy about it.

Have patience, and thank you.
Christopher Paris
Founder
Oxebridge Quality Resources International LLC

ISO 45001:2016 or ISO 45001:2017?

Montag, 15. Februar 2016 - 21:39

http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref2012

ISO 45001 on occupational health and safety has been approved for Draft International Standard public consultation

by Elizabeth Gasiorowski-Denis on 12 February 2016

[...]

Now that ISO 45001 has advanced to the DIS stage, national member bodies of ISO have been invited to vote and comment on the text of the standard during the three-month balloting period. If the outcome is positive, the modified document may then be circulated to ISO members as a Final Draft International Standard (FDIS). In the event of an affirmative vote, ISO 45001 is expected to be published as an International Standard by late 2016 / early 2017. [...]

Registration (required to read the DIS): http://www.iso45001assessment.com/registration.html

Actually, the DIS already was available earlier. But the ISO article has useful links.

As for “ISO 45001 is expected to be published as an International Standard by late 2016 / early 2017″, please visit http://blog.psybel.de/2014/11/11/iso-45001-2017/.

Datenschutz und Arbeitsschutz

Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 - 00:30

DIN: Keine Online-Diskussion zum DIS ISO 45001

Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016 - 01:25

https://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/entwuerfe

[...] Das Online-Portal für Norm-Entwürfe von DIN bietet einen kostenfreien Zugang zu aktuellen Norm-Entwürfen und die Möglichkeit, online Stellungnahmen zu diesen abzugeben. Für alle Experten, die Inhalte einer Norm mit gestalten möchten, ist dies ein bequemer Weg, ihre Kommentare und Änderungsvorschläge einzubringen.

Nutzer haben nach Registrierung die Möglichkeit, aktuelle Norm-Entwürfe zu lesen. Eine Liste mit allen aktuell im Portal kommentierbaren Norm-Entwürfen können Sie sich über die Auswahl “Aktuelle Norm-Entwürfe” in der Menüleiste anzeigen lassen. Darüber hinaus können Sie sich für die Abgabe von Stellungnahmen zu Norm-Entwürfen anmelden. In diesem Fall erhalten Sie von uns eine Erklärung der Einräumung der Urhebernutzungsrechte, deren Unterzeichnung Voraussetzung für eine Online-Eingabe von Änderungs- und Ergänzungsvorschlägen ist. [...]

Hoffnungsvoll klickte ich auf “Aktuelle Norm-Entwürfe” und gelagte so zu einem Suchfeld:

https://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/entwuerfe/ne-stellung/108664!search-na?query=45001

Norm-Entwürfe zur Stellungnahme
Anzahl: 0
Dem Gremium sind keine Elemente zugeordnet

Vielleicht liegt das daran, dass die DIS ISO 45001 in Englisch geschrieben ist und nicht zu den “Norm-Entwürfe von DIN” gehört. Andere Suchen funktionieren, z.B. https://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/entwuerfe/ne-stellung/108664!search-na?query=9000

Glücklicherweise bietet das BSI eine Diskussionsplattform, in der auch der DIS ISO 45001 zu finden ist: https://drafts.bsigroup.com/Home/Details/55801.